Figure 1	Fault Zone Structure
Figure 2	Microfractures as Paleostress Indicators
Figure 3	Fault Evolution Models
Figure 4	Predictions of Fault Evolution Models
Figure 5	Location and Geology of the Punchbowl Fault
Figure 6	Sample Traverse Map, Showing Geology and Sample Locations in Devil's Punchbowl Los Angeles County Park
Figure 7	Subsidiary Fault Intensity Traverses
Figure 8	Microfracture Density Traverse
Figure 9	Open, Healed, and Sealed Microfractures (P46)
Figure 10	Cross-cutting Relations of Microfractures
Figure 11	Cross-cutting Relations of Microfractures and Laumontite Cement
Figure 12a ; b,c	Cross-cutting Relations of Microfractures and Calcite Cement
Figure 13	Cross-cutting Relations of Microfractures and Both Types of Cement
Figure 14	Relations Between Microfracture Fill and Cement
Figure 15a,b; c,d	Cross-cutting Relations of Laumontite Cement and Calcite Filled Microfractures
Figure 16	Cross-cutting Relations of Laumontite and Calcite Cement
Figure 17	Episodes of Calcite Cementation I
Figure 18	Episodes of Calcite Cementation II
Figure 19a,b; c,d	Episodes of Calcite Cementation III
Figure 20	Multiple Episode Calcite Cementation
Figure 21	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample DP10B
Figure 22	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P41A
Figure 23	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P52A
Figure 24	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P41C
Figure 25	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P52B
Figure 26	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P52C
Figure 27	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P18
Figure 28	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P1B
Figure 29	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P54
Figure 30	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P7B
Figure 31	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P10
Figure 32	The Fabric of Different Types of Microfractures in Sample P31B
Figure 33	Individual Point Maxima, Distinguished by Microfracture Type
Figure 34	Composite Microfracture Fabric, 0.025m to 2.4m from Fault
Figure 35a-d; e-h	Composite Microfracture Fabric, 2.5m to 36.0m from Fault
Figure 36	Composite Microfracture Fabric, 130m to 1040m from Fault
Figure 37	Composite Microfracture Fabric: Fold Test I
Figure 38	Composite Microfracture Fabric: Fold Test II
Figure 39a-d , e-f	Composite, Open, and Healed Microfracture Fabrics: Fold Test III
Figure 40	Composite Microfracture Point Maxima: Fold Test IV
Figure 41	Summary of Timing Relations
Figure 42	Damaged Zone Microfracture Fabric
Figure 43	Beyond Damaged Zone Microfracture Fabric
Figure 44	Composite Microfracture Ponit Maxima, Structural Zones
Figure 45	Individual Microfracture Point Maxima, Structure Zones
Figure 46	Orientation of the Maximum Principal Compressive Stress Direction Based on Subsidiary Fault Fabric
Figure 47	Relative Rotations of Open and Healed Microfractures
Figure A1	Effect of Sampling Method on Microfracture Fabric (P7B)
Figure B1	Effect of Inclination Bias Correction on Distribution of Inclination Values
Figure B2	Effect of Inclination Bias Correction on Microfracture Fabric (P7B)
Figure B3	Effect of Grain Weight Correction on Microfracture Fabric (P7B)
Figure D1	Schematic Diagram Illustrating Overlap Zones
Figure D2	Effect of Applying Inclination Bias Correction in Overlap Zones
Figure E1	Schematic Diagram Illustrating Rotations of Thin Section Microfracture Orientations